Skip to main content
Back to cases
FinanceWeb

Team Expense Collection Site

Replace reimbursement screenshots and scattered spreadsheets with one web intake and finance review workspace.

The problem to solve

Expense materials arrive through chat, email, and shared folders. Finance chases invoices, missing fields, and amount checks, then merges everything manually at month end.

Solution

Build a web app: employees submit expense claims and receipts; finance reviews by status and exports a payment list.

Expected outcome

  • Employee page: amount, department, purpose, payment account, receipt upload.
  • Finance page: pending / approved / returned lanes with amount and missing-field chips.
  • Return reason is visible on the employee page.
  • One-click weekly payment list export as CSV / Excel.
  • Browser local drafts and recent review history; ready for a database later.

Example input fields

Before copying, rename your Excel / CSV headers to match these fields — or just paste your real headers into Codex along with the prompt.

Order IDAmountTransaction timeMemo / notesStatus

Copy-ready prompt

You are a senior web app engineer and a thoughtful product manager. Build a runnable, buildable, deployable web app directly. Use business language in the UI and choose sensible implementation defaults.

[Opening Brief]
Before you build, use 3-8 numbered lines to tell the user what's coming. If 3 lines do it, use 3 — one short sentence per line.
Picture, feel, result — not implementation. Plain words. Speak to "you".
Don't promise a timeline ("ready in X minutes") — you can't know. Don't wait for a reply. Follow the [Quick Start Protocol] below immediately.

[Goal]

Turn scattered expense screenshots and spreadsheets into one web intake so finance can review and export payment lists.

[Platform & Stack]

- Web app using Next.js + React + TypeScript
- Use App Router
- Browser local storage for drafts and review history
- Build/deploy from Windows / macOS / Linux
- npm run dev / npm run build / npm run start must pass

[Core Features]

1. Employee submit page: name, department, expense type, amount, date, purpose, payment account, receipt upload.
2. Finance workspace: pending / approved / returned lanes with search, status filter, and amount filter.
3. Missing-field checks: empty amount, missing receipt, or missing payment account shows a yellow chip on the card.
4. Return flow: finance writes a reason; employee sees it and resubmits.
5. Export weekly payment list as CSV / Excel with name, department, amount, account, review time.
6. Seed 12 sample claims covering pending, approved, returned, and missing receipt.

[Visual Style]

Business web app: first screen is the review workspace; clear tables and status lanes; no welcome page or technical UI terms.

[Robustness]

Refresh does not lose drafts; non-image/PDF upload gets a friendly message; empty export explains why and offers sample data.

[Safety Rules]
- Process locally by default; network calls require encryption and explicit user consent.
- No hard-coded API keys, absolute paths, personal emails, or internal hosts.
- All writes go through "Save as"; never overwrite originals; auto-timestamp on conflict.
- Do not invent npm packages; verify with npm view first.
- If real files are missing, create anonymized sample-data first; do not block on user files.

[Execution Discipline]
- Verify each feature immediately after writing it; do not batch all testing to the end.

[Warm UX Contract]
What happens around the code matters more than the code itself. The finish should feel like a gift.
- First launch = demo mode: auto-load sample-data/ and run the main flow once so the user sees a real result page, not an empty state.
- The workspace always has a "Try with sample data" button up top — one click to a full demo any time.
- Buttons, hints, and errors in business language. Example: "Can't find the Order ID column", not "Column 'order_id' not found".
- Operations with ≥3 steps offer Undo or Cancel; ≥5-step critical actions require confirmation.
- Long-running tasks show a progress bar + ETA, refreshed at most once per second.
- The moment the main flow finishes, give in-app feedback; if the window is in the background, also fire a system notification that opens the result on click.
- On failure, always offer the next move (retry / pick another file / view log / copy the error) — never leave a lone red line.

[Success Picture]
The screen at the end of the main flow is the user's lasting impression. Make it feel like a gift.
- Big-number outcome + a ≤30-word business-language summary. Example: "Reconciled 482 orders, 5 mismatches. Saved to Desktop/diff-2026-05.xlsx".
- Key findings as a single colored chip row: "⚠ 3 amount mismatches · ✦ 2 likely refunds".
- Three action buttons in a fixed position: "Open output folder", "Run again", "Pick another file".
- Include a collapsible "What just happened" panel with 5-10 lines of copyable activity log.
- No raw internals (millis, PID, stack traces); if you show time, use human words — "Done in 4s · 482 rows", not "4231ms".

[Project Structure]
├── app/               # Website pages, layouts, routes
├── components/        # Reusable UI components
├── lib/               # Business logic, validation, data transforms (testable)
├── src/data/          # Sample / seed data
├── public/            # Static assets
├── docs/              # User guide + deployment notes + known limits
└── package.json       # dev / build / start scripts

[Error Recovery]
When hitting issues, follow these strategies instead of retrying the same approach:
- Dependency install fails → check spelling, try one major version down, or use --legacy-peer-deps
- Website routing error → check app/ directory placement, page file names, and import paths
- Hydration error → move browser-only logic into useEffect or a client component
- npm run build fails → read the full error, fix types/routes/static asset paths, then rerun build
- Deploy fails → confirm local npm run build and npm run start pass before reading platform logs
- Styles broken → check CSS load order and selector specificity
- Same error 3 times → switch approach or downgrade that feature, do not keep retrying

[Delivery]
1. Scaffold the web app and seed data; home shows the review workspace.
2. Implement employee submission, finance review, return/resubmit, and filters.
3. Add export, README, local start/deploy notes, and verify npm run build.

Acceptance checklist (all must pass):
☐ First screen is the finance review workspace
☐ Employee submission appears in Pending
☐ Approve / return changes status correctly
☐ Missing receipt/account shows a clear warning
☐ Payment list downloads successfully
☐ npm run build passes

[High-Quality Delivery Addendum]
If the prompt says to wait for confirmation, summarize in ≤8 lines, then implement/run/fix/verify; stop only for real files, accounts, certificates, or irreversible actions.

[Quick Start Protocol]
After outputting the [Opening Brief], execute in this order — do not output a plan and wait:
1. Initialize the website app project with TypeScript and App Router
2. Install core deps: next, react, react-dom, typescript, @types/react
3. Write a minimal app/page.tsx; confirm npm run dev opens the home page
4. Create sample-data/ or src/data/seed.ts with realistic anonymized business data
5. Implement features one by one; verify each immediately after writing
6. Finish with README, deployment notes, and npm run build / start verification

[Anti-Patterns — Never Do These]
- Empty function bodies or TODO comments as "done"
- Rendering UI with fake data without wiring real logic
- Writing imports before installing dependencies
- Writing all code at once then running (verify per feature instead)
- Retrying the same failing approach more than 3 times
- Using console.log instead of real error-handling UI
- Ignoring empty states and loading states
- First screen on launch is blank / welcome / settings (should be workspace + demo data)
- Error messages leaking jargon ("Cannot read property", "Column not found")
- Bulk operations with no progress bar / ETA
- Overwriting original files on write (always Save as; timestamp conflicts)
- Finishing with zero feedback (no summary, no buttons, no system notification)

[DoD / Stop-Vibe-Coding]
Done criteria (check each — all must pass before reporting):
☐ Launches; sample data creates the artifact
☐ Edge cases are friendly (empty data, bad format, cancel, name conflict → no crash)
☐ UI meets minimum standards (clear type hierarchy, comfortable spacing, empty states have guidance)
☐ lint/typecheck/test/build pass
☐ Smoke test: launch → main flow → export/save with sample-data; note result
☐ setup/dev/package scripts, README, guide, limits, and samples exist
Stop; new ideas go to v2.

[Final Report Schema]
When everything is done, post this 4-section schema back to me (the user) in chat — not as UI copy. Each section opens with an emoji; body in business language.
✅ Delivered: ≤5 core capabilities, business framing, no jargon.
▶ How to open: one command or "double-click this file" — the user can use it now.
✔ What I verified: lint / typecheck / build / smoke test with sample-data on the main flow, each with PASS or FAIL.
⚠ Known limits & v2 ideas: ≤3 lines, each a single sentence — not a TODO list.

After you copy

1

Open Codex Desktop and start a new task

2

Paste the whole prompt into the chat and send

3

Let Codex build and verify, then tweak names, fields, and buttons as you like

More from this department